|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Citizen Voices: John Street's Responses Education Question: The Philadelphia School District must either:
Answer: We all recognize that high-quality education is key to the future of this City. A quality education is the most primary foundation of a strong work force. Without the strong work force that quality education produces, we will be unable to attract new jobs and new businesses to Philadelphia. The future of Philadelphia's economic success depends upon giving our children the best possible education and every child must be given the opportunity to achieve at the highest level of his or her potential. As President of City Council, I convened the Philadelphia Education Summit. We listened to a diverse group of voices – parents, students, teachers, business owners, members of community organizations, neighbors -- who told us what they wanted from public education. Quite simply, we all know what the children of Philadelphia need and deserve:
Through the Education Summit, we have also learned that we are on the right track. Too often, here and in other cities, people have not given reform initiatives time to achieve scale. Right now in Philadelphia, limited reform initiatives have been instituted and schools are improving. Overall, test scores are up. However, more reforms must be made and we must finish the job that we have started. We must focus on the elements of reform that we know work and strive to ensure that these reforms are expanded and enhanced for the sake of our children. It is important to acknowledge that some reform implementation strategies are not working and we must accept that these must be changed. However, change can occur and it can be successful and I pledge that as Mayor, I will dedicate my administration to making our schools a place of growth, learning, and success. The simple truth is that until every child has a real opportunity to succeed in our public schools – regardless of the location - we have not fulfilled our responsibility to them, to us, nor to the future generations of Philadelphians. The answer, however, does not lie in singular ‘silver bullet' solution or in an entire change in direction; such action will only prolong the misfortune the system is presently facing and will most likely set us back many years. Our children deserve better. The Philadelphia School system is on the brink of a financial crisis unless immediate steps are taken to end the funding stalemate. To this end, I have proposed that the Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority Act (PICA) be amended to extend its jurisdiction to include the School District of Philadelphia. This will enable elected and government leaders from the State and the City to determine the current and future funding needs for Philadelphia's public schools and launch our public school system on the road to fiscal stability and academic reform. PICA is a structure already in place. Its governance has bipartisan confidence and support. Equally important, PICA has the confidence of the investment community I will convene a Public Education Oversight Task Force within 30 days of my election to draft and propose legislation to amend the Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority Act to broaden its jurisdiction to include the Philadelphia School District. It is envisioned that in this expanded role, PICA would serve as the fiscal oversight authority, to ensure that the Philadelphia School District has both sufficient funds and that those funds are efficiently and effectively spent. We must put an end to the notion that vouchers provide a solution to improving public education. I am committed to our public schools – they open the door to personal freedom and full citizenship. I attended public schools; all of my older children attended public schools; my youngest son currently attends one of Philadelphia's public schools. That experience, together with my 19 years of direct involvement with the schools in the City Council and the input we gathered through the Education Summit, tells me that vouchers are not the solution for addressing the problems confronting public education. Supporters of vouchers argue that they provide competition for public schools, forcing schools to either improve or lose students. Vouchers also are offered as solutions for children living in poor school districts – mainly in inner cities – who seek a better education. In reality, vouchers provide support for a few students, but offer little for the majority of students. Even if we maximized the number of private, parochial and charter school seats in this region, 80% of those children now enrolled in Philadelphia's public schools would still be there! In his proposed budget for the year 2000, Governor Ridge included massive funding for education vouchers. One of these proposals was designed to fund a $563 million/five year pilot project. This voucher could be used by parents to pay tuition at any school – public or private, non-sectarian or religious, within or outside of a school district. During the first year of the pilot project, a family with an income of $15,000 or less could qualify – but eventually, families with after-tax income of $75,000 would qualify. The voucher, itself, would be worth about $1500. With the average cost of a private school in Philadelphia ranging from $5,000 - $14,000, a voucher at $1500 would only be helpful to those sufficiently well off to afford the rest of the tuition. Obviously, the greatest percentage of public school parents would not have sufficient income to use the vouchers to send their children to private schools. I value the work of private and independent schools – they contribute significantly to our community. However, it is our constitutional responsibility to address first and foremost the needs of those children who are in our public schools. We know what it takes to provide high-quality education. It takes high-quality pre-school and after school programs, small class sizes, well prepared teachers, computers that students and teachers use effectively, support for at-risk children, and high standards for everyone! Vouchers, designed to take money from our neighborhood public schools would not help achieve a single one of these goals. Rather than vouchers, what is needed is genuine leadership and full, fair funding of our schools. When that occurs, we allow our children and teachers to reach for the stars. Take as an example, the Smedley School, a public elementary school in the Frankford neighborhood of Philadelphia. For the past few years, in addition to its normal budget, the Smedley School received special grants and funding as part of the Frankford Cluster's Accelerated Literacy Initiative. Such funds allowed the school to make dramatic changes. On the recent SAT-9 tests, 80% of the children scored at the level of basic or above. During the past year, 94% of the professional staff attended professional development training. Last year, class size for literacy instruction was reduced to a ratio of 1:10, teachers to students. Recognizing that 65% of these children qualify for Aid to Families with Dependent Children, it can only be argued that full, adequate funding made this possible. Positive reforms take resources.
What could be more important than finishing the challenge of reform so that all of Philadelphia's youngsters also begin to score at the level of proficiency or above? As Mayor, I will also expand initiatives to compliment and nurture academic success. I have proposed a comprehensive after-school program called Kids Involved and Developing Skills (KIDS Initiative). Reports indicate that there are between 50,000 and 90,000 school-age children in Philadelphia in need of after-school programs. Approximately 14,500 children are currently served by all of the programs operating in Philadelphia, leaving up to 75,000 children without constructive activities to participate in between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. That time of the day is critical - national data indicates that children who are unsupervised from 3:00 p.m. until their parents get home are at higher risk for drug, alcohol and tobacco use, delinquent behavior, violent victimization and injury when compared with their peers in constructive programs. Notably, nearly half of all juvenile crime occurs between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. After-school programs reduce not only crime but truancy. Quite simply, children in after-school programs do better in school. With this in mind, I have committed that by the end of my first term in office, my KIDS Initiative will have made substantial in-roads in providing after-school placement for every child in the City. These programs will provide homework help, community service activities, and enrichment programs such as art, music, dance, theater, clubs and organizations, and health and recreation. During the first year of my administration, the KIDS Initiative will increase the City's current after-school funding from the current $1.4 million up to $4.2 million, contingent upon the City's ability to put quality programs in place. Further, I will call upon the broader community, from privates businesses to our system of colleges and universities, to support various components of this City-wide effort. For example, local colleges and universities could not only provide training for program leaders, but tutors and educational support for program participants. I intend to call upon all local colleges and universities to require community service as a requirement for graduation with such students acting as mentors and tutors for our youth. I will also collaborate with the business and philanthropic communities to better coordinate and focus resources and reduce overlap. With this kind of program, our children will have the kind of balanced, overall support they need to achieve success. Once we ‘support the system' through proper vision, leadership and understanding, I believe that we can ‘sharpen the mission' by raising the expectations and helping our students and teachers achieve success.
Neighborhoods Question: With regard to neighborhoods:
Answer: I think that the key to success for Philadelphia's neighborhoods is a profound understanding of this City and an attentive and deliberate combination of environment, jobs, and people. While fixing the ‘environment' can sometimes be essential, doing so without regard to the local economy or the residents of that neighborhood will ultimately lead to failure. Successful neighborhood development incorporates all three parts of the equation. For many of Philadelphia's neighborhoods, success begins with eliminating blight. Most people do not want to live or work in a neighborhood that is rife with abandoned cars, deteriorating houses and trash. Currently, there is insufficient funding for blight elimination efforts. The dilemma is most striking with respect to property demolition, which is highlighted in the current Five Year Plan. The budget for demolition has not measurably increased since 1992; for example, there were 1,539 demolitions in Fiscal Year 1998, up from 1,486 in Fiscal Year 1997. Yet, with approximately 1,000 and 1,300 new ‘dangerous' buildings identified each year, the Department of Licenses and Inspections has simply not been able to reduce the inventory of dangerous buildings, despite marginally increased demolition spending. In a City that is aging quickly, unless we accelerate substantially our capacity to remove blight the decline of our neighborhoods will continue. The tremendous amounts of potential space provide Philadelphia with a unique opportunity, and if we move aggressively to address the blight and implement community and economic development programs, we can stabilize our neighborhoods and stem future abandonment. I have introduced a sweeping plan called "Saving Neighborhoods/Fighting Blight." The proposal recognizes blight removal as a significant part of the foundation required to stabilize communities and capitalize on economic and community development opportunities. My plan, which I will introduce within the first four months of my Administration, advances a strategy which earmarks $250 million dollars solely to eliminate blight in Philadelphia's neighborhoods. The plan will establish the groundwork for pooling significant money for neighborhood stabilization, community enhancement and economic redevelopment. This initiative will convert what has come to represent failure into exciting opportunity. The proposal includes:
I do value the work of civic-minded individuals and groups – and many neighborhoods have preserved their charm through their efforts. Even in neighborhoods that are struggling to survive, it is the effort of community organizations that hold them from further deterioration. My respect for these community individuals and organizations will affect the actions that I take as Mayor. I will establish a process to involve community groups and residents in developing a comprehensive community and economic development program that will include accommodation for community parks, housing with yards and off-street parking, and new retail establishments. A strategic blight removal effort will lay the foundation for investment in community development. As Mayor, I propose to leverage dollars available for blight removal to generate a coordinated $1 billion investment program for community and economic development. Many of the blight elimination efforts will produce jobs for community people. Ultimately, one of my major goals is to ensure that every citizen who wants to work and can work has a quality job. However, before we can attract new businesses and new homeowners to our neighborhoods, we must address the environment and work to remove and improve blighted conditions. By working with residents and community organizations to achieve our common goal we can create a better Philadelphia for all of us.
Safety Question: With regard to safety:
Answer: Just as our neighborhoods will require an attentive and deliberate combination of environment, jobs and people, the question of crime and safety requires a careful combination of ‘getting tougher', ‘working together', and ‘attacking the problem at the roots'. Safe neighborhoods will require a delicate balance between each part of the equation. I have lived in a typical Philadelphia neighborhood for more than 30 years. Community policing, police deployment to curb drug trafficking, gun violence and the proliferation of drug houses are issues that I have lived with on a daily basis. In 1998, crime rose 11% in Philadelphia; crime in most major American cities fell 7%. Even if this increase is merely the result of better record keeping by the police, the bottom line is that it is bad for Philadelphians. I know that crime is counterproductive to maintaining Philadelphia's position as a destination city. Of greater import, is the impact crime, drugs and violence have on neighborhoods and quality of life issues throughout the City. As Mayor, I will employ every available means necessary to take back the streets from those who deprive us of the crime-free and peaceful enjoyment of all the City has to offer. During my term as President of City Council, I fought tirelessly to reduce crime in our City. I:
As Mayor, I will work with the District Attorney, the Police Commissioner, the Director of the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency, Town Watch groups, and community organizations dedicated to the eradication of drugs and violence to eliminate drugs and the crime and violence they spawn in our communities and in our lives. I will also work to expand prevention initiatives, though improved public education, high-quality after-school programs and activities for children of all ages (KIDS Initiative), additional support for truancy reduction initiatives, and collaboration with community and religious organizations working to make the future for Philadelphia's children brighter. In addition to working to prevent crime, I will work to fight crime. As Mayor, I will attack the roots of crime, encourage and support collaboration, and make a life of crime more difficult through the following programs and initiatives:
The proliferation of guns in the United States has created a national crisis that threatens every single American family. In Philadelphia, gun violence, in conjunction with the scourge of crime and drugs, continue to drain the life-blood out of our neighborhoods. Eighty percent of the deaths in this City are attributed to crimes committed with guns. The menace of gun violence endangers communities, families, and children. As Mayor, I will take steps to get guns off our streets and out of the hands of our children.
The suit will seek an order directing gun manufacturers to alter marketing and distribution practices and to prohibit gun wholesalers and retailers from selling more than one handgun to the same person in any 30-day period.
Jobs and Economic Development The City must continue to pursue aggressive strategies to create jobs for Philadelphia. The strategy must provide a multi-pronged approach, which includes:
Taxes: As I have mentioned elsewhere, I support the plan for continued reductions in the City's wage and business taxes provided for in the City's Five Year Financial Plan. The reasonable and steady approach to reducing taxes according to the Plan has created confidence in the City's fiscal stability that has resulted in unprecedented business retention and growth over the last several years. Small Businesses: Major corporations have often been the catalysts for public/private developments, and a corporation who decides to expand or relocate to Philadelphia can serve as an anchors for future economic growth. Interestingly, however, it is also the major corporations that test the fortitude of our economy when layoffs, downsizing, outsourcing, relocations and closings occur. While we must continue to welcome and foster the growth and development of large corporations, it is crucial that we refocus on small and emerging businesses throughout Philadelphia. Small businesses frequently provide the long-term stability neighborhoods need, even when they are struggling to grow or become financially viable. The simple bottom line is that small businesses are the mainstays in our neighborhoods, employers of local residents, and serve as the bedrock for our local economy. Major corporations provide the anchor, but small business provides the stability. A comprehensive approach to the ensuring the foundation of this vital segment of our business community is essential and must be deliberate, consistent, and programmed into all economic development decisions of this local government. As City Council President, I was the chief architect who pushed for the inclusion of small local businesses and minority, women and disabled owned businesses on projects before the City Council, including the Shops At The Airport, First Union Center, U.S. Airways International and Commuter Terminals and all TIF projects. As Mayor, I believe a small business strategy must focus on seven areas:
a) minimize overhead expenses for the small business owner; b) provide vital technical assistance (i.e., business plan assistance, business start-up training, computer training, human resource training, identifying and assisting in contract opportunities, etc.); c) create a network of business owners reinforcing the ownership concept through competition and idea sharing.
Or, the ultimate owner could be the local community development corporation creating community wealth using local residents to manage and operate.
These districts have become essential factors in the upkeep and viability of our downtown and neighborhoods. This concept works and should continue to be duplicated citywide.
We do not always need to reinvent the wheel. In several instances, the programs are in place that can provide the needed resources. Several operate successfully in relative obscurity, while others are better known. While government has an interest in each area, some services are better provided by the private sector where local government lends it support.
Review and build on the successes of the empowerment zone projects, developments and opportunities to ensure the creation of wealth in neighborhoods and that when funding ends, the initiatives don't end.
In addition to these seven areas, there are more initiatives and plans that can be put into place: Maximizing Jobs from Public Investment: Over the past several years the City of Philadelphia has experienced a surge in business opportunities and a revitalization of its local economy, largely mirroring national trends. These opportunities are affirmed daily by the plethora of skyscrapers now gracing the Philadelphia skyline, creating a new aesthetic launched by the historic construction of Liberty I and Liberty II. Development of the City's central business district proved to be the lifeblood for a renewed and revitalized Philadelphia. These major economic development projects also have provided thousands of jobs to neighborhood residents. As a Member of City Council, I fought for legislation that provides hospitality industry training funds for our schools to ensure Philadelphians would be prepared for the job opportunities created through City investment. The City must continue to support the work of the School District's Jobs to Career programs to assure that Philadelphia residents benefits from the millions of dollars invested in major economic development projects. Legislation supporting City investment must have as a component specific job opportunity requirements for City residents. Developing Sector-focused Strategies: Critical sectors of the local economy are undergoing profound changes. The City must develop specific policies and strategies for each sector. For example, the health care industry provides approximately 200,000 jobs throughout the region. It is estimated the industry could face as many as 40,000 layoffs by 2002. The City must develop a policy that guides its response. For example, currently the City ‘s Hospital Authority is one of the largest debt issuers in the country, the City's review of its request for authorization to issue is perfunctory. Instead, it should be governed by policy. That policy must:
Similar specific policies and strategies must be developed for targeting spin-off industries that capitalize on the regional presence of high-tech industries such as SAP, the plethora of data processing based sectors, among others.
Government Reform
The next Mayor of this City must, to some degree, take something from each of the four models that have been proposed by Citizen Voices. The Philadelphia Home Rule Charter has created for the citizens of Philadelphia a "strong mayor" form of government. Thus, it is the Mayor who has ultimate responsibility for establishing direction and priorities for the City. It is what the Mayor is elected to do. The Mayor, at the same time, is the City's chief executive officer. In this capacity it behooves the Mayor to identify and attract the most effective and experienced people in their respective fields to serve in government. In areas ranging from the Mayor's Office of Information Services to the Finance Department to the Division of Aviation to the Streets Department and the Recreation Department the City needs bright talented leaders with the necessary expertise. Politics and partnerships, however, are an essential component of our democratic form of government. Although we have a strong mayor form of government and a mayor who is the chief executive officer, the mayor does not operate in a vacuum. The Mayor works in conjunction with City Council. As required by the City's Home Rule Charter, it is the City's legislative body that annually must enact a City budget proposed by the Mayor. It is our Home Rule Charter that mandates City Council review and approve of long-term contracts. Politics and politicians are inherent in our form of government. As President of City Council, I demonstrated that effective government and politics need not be at odds. Politicians can and must be responsible partners in government. The partnership is not limited to the Mayor and City Council. Citizens have a right and a responsibility to influence how government operates. As Council President, I held public hearings in neighborhoods throughout the City to solicit citizen input on City budgets. As Council President, I convened Council hearings in public housing developments to highlight the conditions in our public housing development. During my tenure in City Council, I co-convened the Philadelphia Education Summit that involved more than 3,000 Philadelphia residents in an 18-month dialogue about the future of public education in our City. I believe that Citizen involvement is essential to the collaboration required for our City to move thrive. I reject proposals calling for slashing City taxes. One of the Mayor's primary responsibilities is managing the City's finances. The fiscal health of the City allows us few mistakes – resources must be used efficiently and effectively to meet the social, economic and educational goals and challenges we face. As a Member of City Council, I introduced legislation to reduce the real estate transfer tax. As City Council President I supported reasonable reductions in both the wage and business privilege taxes. As Mayor I will continue to support a rollback in wage and business taxes. I believe a reduction in taxes with spur economic growth in our City and region. Dramatic and irresponsible proposals to slash City taxes, however, will drain hundreds of millions of dollars from the City's general fund, jeopardize essential services undermine the hard work of the last seven years and jeopardize our plans for the future I believe the City can do more with the resources that are available paving the way for a reasonable course of tax reductions. Many services and programs are provided through different City departments and agencies. Careful and thoughtful collaboration must take place so that the collective resources are maximized. Entities such as the Mayor's Cabinet for Children and Families, that has examined the wasteful and inefficient overlap in services between departments and agencies and proposed creative alternative models for service delivery, serve as a beginning. We must reach deeper if we are to achieve scale and be able to focus city resources on prevention rather than the more costly interventions. Citizens must have active roles as partners in government. Without the involvement of the citizenry – as individuals, as neighbors and through organizations – no real progress can be made in revitalizing this city's social and fiscal health. However, citizens have to believe that their voices and actions produce results. There is no reason that a group of citizens who petition to have an abandoned car moved off the block should have to wait anywhere between 6 and 18 months to see it moved! My plan for Saving Neighborhoods/Blight Elimination will rely heavily on community participation. It is imperative that the Mayor develop alliances with local State officials as well as local leaders and government representatives. Too often the messages we transmit to Harrisburg are mixed, and this does not serve us well. As Mayor, I will establish a process that will lead to community consensus on issues that must be presented to Harrisburg. While the process of community involvement may take more time at the beginning of an initiative, we are more likely to be heard by Harrisburg
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 1998, Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution, or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. is expressly prohibited. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||