|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Safety: A Citizen Voices Issue FrameworkCHOICE ONE - GET TOUGHER. People would feel safer, this choice contends, if at long last criminals in Philadelphia knew that the costs of committing crime would outweigh the benefits. The solution, in this view, is simple and direct. Make sure enforcement is swift and sure; make sure punishment is swift and severe. In this view, the city should make sure its police force has the numbers, the equipment and the training to do its part of the job. Then police should be left alone to do their jobs protecting the public. Their hands shouldn’t be tied by second-guessing from community agitators, grandstanding politicians or nitpicking judges. Common pleas judges, whose leniency this view sees as a major reason Philadelphians don’t feel safe, should have their discretion limited and their performance more rigorously reviewed. In this view, what ought to be clear-cut roles in the search for safer streets have been diluted by muddled thinking: The court system needs to pay more attention to the rights of victims, less to the rights of criminals. Prisons need to about punishment, period. Social institutions such as schools and churches need to take the lead as they once did in teaching respect for the law and for authority. Citizens need to be free to take sensible precautions to safeguard their property and families, including legal gun ownership.
What specific actions should be taken?
What are the key arguments for this choice?
What are the key arguments against this choice?
What values underlie this choice? Order. Respect for the rule of law. Just punishment. Security. Taking a stand. Victim’s rights. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 1998, Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution, or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. is expressly prohibited. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||