|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Government: A Citizen Voices Issue FrameworkCHOICE THREE: SHRINK AND CUT
The main reason Philadelphians are unhappy with the return on their tax dollar, this view argues, is that the city government charges high taxes to perform services that government, by its very nature, does not do well. This combination of high taxes for poor service drives people and jobs out of the city. In this view, city government should stick to a few very basic priorities that only it can fulfill. The most clear-cut of these is public safety, that is, running police and fire departments, a court system and prisons. Another is maintaining a road system. Even in some other areas where government traditionally plays a role - such as schools and prisons – proponents of this choice would have the city contract out services to profit or nonprofit firms that would do the job more efficiently. For many other services, this choice would just as soon that government stop playing tax-collecting middleman. Let citizens shop and buy services such as trash removal, using the money they save on taxes. This form of privatization goes beyond mere contracting out, where government still collects taxes for a service, but then hires private companies to do or manage the work. The city, according to proponents of this choice, should stop trying to make policy or intervene in areas where private markets are always wiser than government, such as job training and economic development. This will save more tax money. Government regulation of business and individuals should be kept to the minimum consistent with public safety. In this view, this strategy is the best hope the city has of attacking the high cost of living and doing business that has crippled Philadelphia for decades. What specific steps should be taken?
What are the arguments for this choice?
What are the key arguments against this choice?
cities and states are using them aggressively to court employers.
What values underlie this choice? Free enterprise. The "invisible hand." Individualism. Volunteerism. Self-reliance. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 1998, Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution, or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. is expressly prohibited. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||